|
Technology Vision
Mark Yudof, President of University of
Minnesota, is quoted as saying “Vision
without resources is hallucination.” We are
fortunate that previous and present
administrations in the College of Education at the
University of Florida have dedicated resources to
the acquisition of educational technologies and the
establishment of an Office of Educational
Technology.
However, merely providing resources related to
technology does not establish a vision for the use
of educational technologies in the teaching and
learning environment for a College. NCATE
requirements can spur an organization to start this
process but it takes more to establish a technology
vision.
In an attempt to provide a foundation for the
technology vision in the College of Education at
the University of Florida, we worked to
provide ways for all stakeholders in all programs
within the College of Education to come together to
shape the technology vision that will guide our
College in the future. We used the
C-R-E-A-T-E-R model by Havelock and Zlotolow (1995)
to assist in the creation of our vision.
Establishing a vision takes considerable time
because of the support and buy-in needed by so many
programs and areas. This work merely started the establishment of a common vision for technology integration in our teacher education program.
During the first year of our grant, we met with
our Advisory Board to gather their insights on this
issue. Valuable suggestions were given on
disseminating our goals throughout the University
community. It was encouraging to know we are
not alone in establishing a technology vision that
will lead us successfully into the 21st century.
This was also happening in other programs and
colleges within the University of Florida
community.
Because the College of Education was in the
process of searching for a new dean, the college
administration requested that we delay working with
the Office of the Dean to establish a college-wide
vision for technology. Therefore, the plans for
various conversations have been delayed. However,
learning about the ideas and concerns for a vision
for the use of educational technologies by
individual faculty, departments, and schools still needed to be done.
During the second year, we began conversations
with individual faculty to better gather
information on how they were using technology in
the teaching of their courses, where they would
"like to go" with technology, and how the role they
believed educational technologies should play in
the College. In our initial stages of data
gathering, we interviewed faculty in the Unified
Elementary ProTeach program. This allowed us to not
only gather their cares, concerns, and thoughts,
but also to document our integration of the NETS*T
standards within the unified elementary program. We
are pleased to say that the efforts of our faculty
resulted in the Unified
Elementary ProTeach program being recognized by
the ISTE as a NETS 2003 Distinguished Achievement
Award Winner. We were recognized at NECC 2003 for
this accomplishment. See pictures of Melissa
McCallister, an instructor for EME 4406 in the
Unified Elementary ProTeach program, accepting this
award for the University of Florida.
Another part of working to establish a vision
for technology in the College of Education was to
understand change in educational systems. During
year two of the grant, the Mentor Team, consisting
of all project personnel on the grant, was
established. During the fall semester, the group
read and discussed Surviving Change: A Survey
of Educational Change Models by James
Ellsworth. This allowed project personnel to better
understand change, discuss the change models
relevance to our initiative, and brainstorm ideas
about working with stakeholders to establish a
vision for the College of Education.
It was also important for us to use data to help
guide our vision for the use of educational
technologies in the College of Education. During
year two, we began one research project that provided additional guidance as we develop our
college vision. The work of this study sought to
determine how our courses influenced students'
attitudes, skills, and abilities in using
educational technologies, and how our courses
compared to others across the nation.
During the third year of the Teaching &
Technology Initiative, the administration at the
University of Florida, the College of Education,
and the School of Teaching & Learning began to
stabilize. Therefore, we began to move ahead
on our vision to support interdisciplinary
technology integration. We worked
with our director of the School of Teaching &
Learning, Dean, Associate Dean for Technology and
numerous others on this vision. Ongoing
conversations within individual program areas also occurred. One of the major initiatives
related to interdisciplinary technology integration
was the conceptualization and development of the Teaching with Technology Exploration Center.
Our PT3 grant was able to leverage some
additional funds to renovate a series of classrooms
in order to form the Teaching with Technology Exploration Center. The center opened during the fourth year of the Teaching and Technology Initiative. This
center is a place where preservice teachers
can practice using various educational technologies
(probes, simulations, etc.) and software
appropriate for the teaching of mathematics and
science. Our preservice teachers are able to
practice their lesson using these tools before
implementing them in a classroom. This Center continues to allow faculty to
share their vision of how technology should be used
in their individual programs and work toward a
common vision of technology integration for our
teacher education program. Not only will this
shared vision increase our students' proficiency
and effectiveness of using educational technologies
in their teaching but it works on building the
sustainability of the Teaching with Technology Exploration Center and
the shared vision of technology integration in our
teacher education program.
In addition, during the 4th year of the Teaching and Technology Initiative, Dr. Swain conducted a research study involving teacher education faculty in the School of Teaching and Learning to develop an innovation configuration map of what the innovation of integration technology into teacher education should look like for the College of Education teacher education programs. This research study will be presented at the NECC 2005 conference.
|