|
|
Evaluation Efforts
Evaluation is both a formative and summative
process. We have worked to document success in
making progress in successfully fulfilling all of
the objectives and goals associated with the
Teaching and Technology Initiative. Nevertheless,
we emphasized different components of the grant for
evaluation. Professional development opportunities
(goal 2) was emphasized the first year and
technology field-based field experiences for the
second year (goal 3). During both Year One and Two
of the Teaching and Technology Initiative, the
a-e-I-o-u evaluation model was used. (This model is
briefly explained in the Year One Evaluation plan.)
However, during year two we developed a better
understanding of the need for evaluating remarks
"It is a great misfortune that the best trained
evaluators have been looking at education with a
microscope rather than a panoramic view finder."
(p.536) Although there is a need to find an
evaluation model that addresses the complexities
and messiness associated with the initiative, we
also found we were getting bogged down in models.
Therefore, for the third year of the grant, we went
back to our theoretical frameworks to guide how we
did our analyzed and evaluated our year three
activities. We recognized that Ely's Conditions of
Change, the CBAM Stages of Concern Questionnaire,
and the CREATER model worked with each goal along
with the entire initiative. Therefore, we have
models within models being used to guide us in our
evaluation efforts. Please view evaluation
documents for each year of the Teaching and
Technology Initiative.
Year One: HTML
or PDF
Year Two: PDF
Year Three: PDF
|